Re: is xorg.conf still needed

["dwight at supercomputer.org" <dwight supercomputer org>]

On Wednesday 30 April 2008 01:13:27 am Matej Cepl wrote:

> The whole truth is that we are on the way towards Stateless Linux
> (which means here xorg.conf-less X), but we are not there yet. To
> be honest, the way is long and the question is whether we will
> arrive at Fedora 10 or later. 
> ...

Are we really? Upon what do you base that statement? I'd be very 
interested in knowing more, because the Stateless Linux mailing list 
looks rather inactive. Is there a roadmap? And what's the current 
status?

I'd also interested in contributing if I could, because I've found 
portions of it to be extremely useful. I daresay critical for 
certain next-generation embedded Linux platforms. It would be great 
if progress could be made by Fedora 10, and it would be a real shame 
if that opportunity were lost. Especially since Microsoft is picking 
up steam in this embedded space, from what I've seen.

    -dwight-