[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: is xorg.conf still needed



On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 04:56 -0800, dwight at supercomputer.org wrote:
> I don't believe it, but your reply doesn't answer my question. 
> Where's the roadmap, and what's the plan for getting there? And 
> who's in charge, and who's involved?

Who's involved? Google is currently leading the way, especially in the
"back end":

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/var_0.html

GNOME is working on a front end:

http://live.gnome.org/OnlineDesktop

And Red Hat is integrating it all:

http://mugshot.org/

If you're expecting roadmaps and plans, you're going to be disappointed.
This is new territory, just being discovered. Who's in charge? Whoever
gets there first.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]