Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Bruno Wolff III <bruno wolff to>]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:53:43 -0400,
  Adam Jackson <ajackson redhat com> wrote:
> 
> There's a detail here for outputs, which is that we don't always do
> sensible things if we try to start X with no monitor attached, and for
> some KVMs it's tough to tell the difference between not attached and
> merely not active.  That's just a bug though.

Or even when the code knows a monitor is attached, but it doesn't do EDID.