New Sponsor Request: Denis Leroy

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun May 4 08:11:11 UTC 2008


On 04.05.2008 00:23, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 16:55 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>>>  Which administrators are you talking about?
>> The following people would not receive mail sent to
>> cvsextras-sponsors at fedoraproject.org:
>> bpepple,bdpepple at gmail.com,Brian Pepple,administrator,7
>> gdk,gdk at redhat.com,Greg DeKoenigsberg,administrator,0
>> skvidal,skvidal at linux.duke.edu,Seth Vidal,administrator,3
>> sopwith,sopwith+fedora at gmail.com,Elliot Lee,administrator,21
>> spot,tcallawa at redhat.com,Tom Callaway,administrator,38
>> thl,fedora at leemhuis.info,Thorsten Leemhuis,administrator,6
>> wtogami,wtogami at redhat.com,Warren Togami 砥上勇,administrator,55
> [...]
>> Are you wishing to exclude these people from the process?  I think not.....
> Well, Greg and Elliot seem to have bowed out of the packaging
> perspective a while ago.  The rest, with the exception of Thorsten,

And skvidal afaics

> are in FESCo and would review and discuss eventually anyway.
> 
> I don't really care either way, but it seems that you're making a bit of
> a deal over nothing :).

In case somebody cares: I received the mail Brian recently sent to
cvsextras-sponsors.

BTW, if somebody want's to downgrade me to a normal sponsor feel free to
do so. There is afaics no reason for me to be admin in cvsextras anymore.

In fact I didn't even sponsor anyone for a long time and didn't do much
reviews(¹) or other work in Fedora. Thus maybe I should even be
downgraded to a normal contributor. But a good bunch of other sponsors
from the early Fedora-days seem mostly inactive as well. Thus a general
cleanup in that group (²) might be wise -- but on the other hand it
likely doesn't matter much in the end so might not be worth the trouble.

Cu
knurd

(¹) -- and the last one I tried was stolen by somebody else ;-) (no, I'm
not complaining -- it was no problem and the packages was fine)

(²) -- and in cvsextras itself as well -- there are likely a lot of
contributors in that group that left or are AWOL




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list