FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[...snip...]

> them.  So autoconf213 is needed for firefox development.  That's
> certainly a valid reason, and it should be documented somewhere (in
> the autoconf213 spec, maybe) so that we won't forget next year when
> someone again asks why we still have autoconf213 around.
> 
> Perhaps we can port a few packages over to a recent automake and get
> rid of some of the old versions.  It certainly wouldn't be a bad
> thing.
> 

*cough* HackFest *cough*

-Jeroen