Maintainer Responsibility Policy

[Brian Pepple]

On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:10 +0200, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> 2008/5/6 Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>:
>         
>         === Miscellaneous Items ===
>              * Maintainers need to maintain an upgrade path for their
>                packages.
>                      * F(current-1) -> F(current) -> Rawhide
>              * Packages should be pushed to the Rawhide branch first.
>         If it
>                builds and works fine for a few days, then it can be
>         pushed to
>                F(current). If there is a good reason to push it to
>                F(current-1), it should be done after a few days of
>         being in
>                F(current).
> 
> I think you should also mention the act of "pushing to testing" repo
> for each current fedora release.

Yeah, that's not a bad idea. I believe when that section was written,
Bodhi wasn't even around (which tells you how long this proposal has
been around).  I'll add a note.

Thanks,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080506/3ad782fa/attachment.sig>