F9 potential service network bug?

[Ahmed Kamal]

Would it hurt then to have left the legacy network on by default ? Or at
least spew an orange warning when detecting legacy config files that would
require legacy network to run

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/5/16 Ahmed Kamal <email.ahmedkamal at googlemail.com>:
> > ick, nope. Well, thanks for the hint :) But it should really work without
> > even disabling NM. Instead I'm getting this in the logs:
> > messages-20080514:May 13 09:15:32 magic1 nm-system-settings:
> > ifcfg-fedora:     error: Unknown connection type 'Bridge'
> >
> > What else could be wrong?
>
> NM doesn't handle all usage cases yet, which is why the legacy network
> stack is still available for people who need it.
>
> -jef"Rome wasn't built in a day and all that jazz"spaleta
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080517/7d4cae14/attachment.htm>