F9 (bug?) Superblock features different from backup

[Eric Sandeen]

Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:59:38 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote
> 
>> Problem is, the kernel sets things on the fly, but does not update the
>> backups.  This is ... annoying... because then it causes the full
>> fsck.
> 
> And why doesn't the kernel propagate those flags (on umount, for example)?

Well, if the kernel is going to set things on the fly (which IMHO it
shouldn't) then it should do it properly (from the perspective of fsck)
on all backup superblocks.  As to why it doesn't?  No good answer for you.

-Eric