Re: Interest in Cell architecture SIG

[Aidan Delaney <a j delaney brighton ac uk>]

Josh,
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 11:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'd rather do this under the PPC SIG, rather than create a whole new
> one just for Cell.
That makes sense.

> Now, providing a whole new toolchain might be possible but you'd have
> to make sure it doesn't conflict with the stock toolchains.
At the moment I'm just looking at providing tools prefixed with "spu-"
such as spu-as, spu-ld, spu-gcc etc...  I don't expect conflicts as
these packages are based on the current gcc versions in Fedora (with the
same patches).

--
Aidan Delaney