ipa conflicts with mod_ssl (F9)
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Thu Nov 20 18:55:43 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:37 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> mod_nss and mod_ssl can co-exist ok. The problem is when you also want
> to use mod_proxy. mod_proxy doesn't have a generic way to register SSL
> callbacks. It has a single API. Both mod_ssl and mod_nss can register
> those callbacks but mod_nss will defer to mod_ssl if it is already
> loaded.
Is there any advantage in mod_proxy using mod_ssl versus mod_nss?
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081120/ace4cb04/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list