ipa conflicts with mod_ssl (F9)

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Thu Nov 20 18:55:43 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:37 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> mod_nss and mod_ssl can co-exist ok. The problem is when you also want 
> to use mod_proxy. mod_proxy doesn't have a generic way to register SSL 
> callbacks. It has a single API. Both mod_ssl and mod_nss can register 
> those callbacks but mod_nss will defer to mod_ssl if it is already 
> loaded.

Is there any advantage in mod_proxy using mod_ssl versus mod_nss?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081120/ace4cb04/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list