Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

["Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa gmail com>]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:43 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> IMHO this proposal is not useful at all. As someone else already
>> pointed, following Richard's advice, xine, totem, mplayer, vlc would
>> all have the same description. Is this an improvement for the end
>> user? I don't think so. Is this an improvement for the packager? Not
>> at all.
>
> I don't think that's true at all, please re-read my email.
>
> Richard.


How would that be bad though.

Would it really be bad if the summaries of xine, totem, mplayer and
VLC all read 'multi-codec media player'?


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )