RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Nov 23 10:39:11 UTC 2008


Le dimanche 23 novembre 2008 à 12:21 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :

> The consensus doesn't seem to be entirely clear

Meaning there are none

>  but I added the check anyway 

Please do not add checks to rpmlint which have not been reviewed by FPC.
Packagers are taking rpmlint output as authoritative and I don't see why
we should bother with FPC at all if you're taking policy in your hands.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081123/502320ad/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list