[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: First Report



On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:38 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > The first cycle of rebuilds is done, and here's the results.
> >
> > There were 7 packages that I didn't have permission to modify. I trust
> > that the maintainers will be gracious enough to modify and build them
> > for me:
> >
> > beecrypt
> > certmaster
> > duplicity
> > func
> > pexpect
> > rpm
> > xulrunner
> >   
> 
> We can probably see about Func & certmaster rebuilds next week.
> 
> I am unclear on what you would have to modify as it seems you just need 
> to rebuild all the packages.

The optimal case would be just a release bump. Just slightly more
difficult would be if the package hardcodes the egg-info path. Anything
else... may need more work. Especially if your Python code uses the new
reserved words in 2.6.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]