Lennart Poettering <mzerqung <at> 0pointer.de> writes:
> Hmm, am I the only one who finds the choice of the term "überpackager"
> a bit questionnable?
No, you aren't. I also consider the "uberpackager" name to be stupid due to the
connotations that term has picked up, +1 for renaming it to "superpackager".
Kevin Kofler