pguiman has no maintainer

[Jon Stanley]

Short circuiting is fine here since maintainer was @redhat and mail
bounces and user didn't update their FAS acct and no other contact
method is known.

This counts as a +1 from a FESCo member, sorry for the top post, I'm
out right now.

On 10/23/08, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:51:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pguiman
>> >>
>> >> Maintainer "odvorace" gives "user unknown" at Red Hat.
>> >> Pkg ACLs are locked down.
>> >
>> > Who takes care of issues like this?
>> > Is it necessary to follow the lengthy AWOL procedure?
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/468160
>> >
>> I've opened the acl.
>>
>> Would FESCo like to short circuit the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy in
>> this case?  It seems like most of the steps in the procedure have been
>> followed except that the opening of the bugzilla bug was done last
>> instead of first.
>
> I didn't start any formal process. This is only one of a few packages
> where I stumbled into locked ACLs while fixing lots of unowned
> directories. Mailing the owner then failed.
>
> There's another open ticket which is unanswered for several months.
> The app crashes and possibly doesn't work much, given that it's only
> 0.0.1.
>
> The missing packager is also the upstream developer.
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
jstanley at fedoraproject.org