Simo Sorce wrote:
>So the answer seems to be that glibc will not change it's simple internal resolver (which has more limitations than just noticing resolv.conf changes), but the recommendation is that lwresd or a local caching nameserver be used for more complex DNS setups.A caching nameserver that can be instructed what to do when conditions change is what we really need.
Isn't it a little late to redesign the internet so names and addressing aren't delegated hierarchically?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell gmail com