[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The state of resolv.conf



Simo Sorce wrote:
>
So the answer seems to be that glibc will not change it's simple
internal resolver (which has more limitations than just noticing
resolv.conf changes), but the recommendation is that lwresd or a local
caching nameserver be used for more complex DNS setups.

A caching nameserver that can be instructed what to do when conditions
change is what we really need.

Isn't it a little late to redesign the internet so names and addressing aren't delegated hierarchically?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell gmail com


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]