consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As mentioned, KDE was just an example.
> 
> Or IOW: I'm wondering what new Features we might have no FeaturePage, 
> but are nevertheless worth mentioning in the release notes or should get 
> testing during QA.

Magic 8-ball says??

Seriously, this is a serve yourself kind of deal here.  If you want your
software tested and lauded, you need to bring it to people's attention.
The amount of churn in Fedora in a daily basis is huge, and trying to
extrapolate feature type information from the builds is no easy task.

If you wished to create some group of people who tried to do this, I
wouldn't stop you, in fact I'd welcome it.  There just isn't anybody
doing it right now.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080918/3b38217c/attachment.sig>