Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>]

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> The PK argument used to be comps groups suck, are distro-specific,
> have no equivalent on some distros, so people should drop comps and
> contribute to pk hardcoded stuff instead.

Sure. PK groups are different to comps groups. There are tons of comps
groups, and I wanted only a few that we can share between distros. There
are other distros than fedora that will share these categories.

> NIH syndrom IMHO

NSFU (not suitable for us) actually.

Richard.