How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:49 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 
> It's not. Groups are a subset of the comps groups. I've done substantial
> user research, and I'm sorry to say fine grained categories _do not
> work_ with real users. None of the people in
> http://www.packagekit.org/pk-profiles.html could tell me what they
> expected to find in base-system/system-tools or base-system/admin-tools,
> or tell me the difference between them.

So your solution is to invent something else entirely, rather than
helping Fedora clean up its groupings definitions?  Really?  Nice.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080922/57a62c9e/attachment.sig>