How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

Mon Sep 22 21:00:34 UTC 2008

Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> Is "not suitable for us" supposed to mean that PK is trying to hard to
> be generic across the distros so that we lose the classifications and
> groupings we work on in Fedora, so that PK is not suitable for Fedora?

I agree that that's about the only conclusion we can draw.

        Kevin Kofler