Re: Sourceforge URLs (was: Re: Fever spamming)

[Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>]

Richard W.M. Jones <rjones <at> redhat.com> writes:
> Ugh, I didn't realise it was this complicated ...  Unfortunately a lot
> of these MinGW packages are hosted on SourceForge.  Is the (draft)
> policy below still correct?

The source URLs in the packaging guidelines (i.e. what ends up in specfiles) 
still work fine.

What needs to be fixed is the file list URLs used in FEver. This only affects 
FEver.

       Kevin Kofler