My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:02:25 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:

> Seth Vidal wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:37 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote:
> >>> You will not find anyone @RH who will agree that
> >>> previews behavior was better
> >>
> >> On the contrary, you'll likely find many people who work for Red
> >> Hat that would prefer the old behavior, they're just not wasting
> >> their time by arguing about it on a distribution mailing list.
> > 
> > In a survey of 10 RH employees you will find between 10 and 40
> > different opinions. sometimes more if you don't ask some of them to
> > confine their comments to a limited amount of time.
> Classical situation to call "the management", let them decide and to 
> name "someone to be in charge/responsible".
> 
> Unfortunately, this current FESCO has refused to decide.

No. FESCo did decide not to force maintainers to revert this change. 

Speaking only for myself, I think such micro-management sets a bad
precedent and should be avoided except in extraordinary situations,
which I don't think this is. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090417/e5cb1d4c/attachment.sig>