Re: F10: yum update broken

[Tom Lane <tgl redhat com>]

Gerry Reno <greno verizon net> writes:
> I wish that the mirrors could run two repos, one online, one offline and 
> just switch between them with a pointer. That way they would always 
> appear consistent to clients. Whenever a big sync would happen it would 
> happen to the offline repo and once it was finished then the offline 
> repo would become the online repo. 100% consistency.

I don't think it's that easy ... updates that are in progress are still
likely to see issues.  For instance, the package list you pulled ten
minutes ago might say foo-1.2.3 is current, but by now the one that's
visible on http is foo-1.2.4.  This is presumably soluble (eg, maybe
keep recently-obsoleted packages on-line for awhile), but it's certainly
not as simple as swapping a top-level symlink.

			regards, tom lane