Re: Independent Fedora bug tracker

[Matej Cepl <mcepl redhat com>]

On 2009-04-22, 15:57 GMT, Tom Lane wrote:
> If there are two trackers involved, one or the
> other is going to get looked at less frequently, and given who pays
> me I'm afraid Fedora is going to lose out.

I would add that there are components, which I am going through 
just because it is more convenient to do so, but in case I would 
have to set up new queries just to satisfy somebody's need for 
change, I would just skip them ... seamonkey, epiphany, galeon, 
that's about you, I am talking!

Matej