FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Apr 24 23:52:45 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:41 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 04/24/2009 04:36 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > If they can't mandate this then I suspect the only option left is to
> > enact the contingency plan, which neither party seems to want to happen.
> >
> > So I'm not sure I see the point in you forcing any point.
> 
> The plan is as designed per the feature page.  Just some people decided 
> post-freeze that they don't like it.

Or rather didn't fully understand the limited scope of coverage for F11.
FESCo isn't mandating anything.  In fact after a long and (un)healthy
discussion, a compromise for the sake of F11 was reached, one that
doesn't require any changes to existing software, only the addition of
one package.  Comparing it to the Codina fiasco isn't exactly fair.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090424/6fa9b0ce/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list