Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424

[Dave Airlie <airlied redhat com>]

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > A compromise works best if both parties are on board.  I don't believe 
> > that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being 
> > installable if people want.  No CLI needed since we have GUI install 
> > tools.  The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by 
> > default on the desktop live/install spins.
> 
> See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
> available in Fedora.  The middle ground between reverting the mixer
> feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
> installed by default available in the menus.  That was the compromise.
> If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it
> was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level
> if they wish.
> 

The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install,
surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not
or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include
either of these.

Dave.

> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list