FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Sat Apr 25 01:12:01 UTC 2009


Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
>> available in Fedora.  The middle ground between reverting the mixer
>> feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
>> installed by default available in the menus.  That was the compromise.
> 
> The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install,
> surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not
> or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include
> either of these.
> 
Jesse was replying to this:

> A compromise works best if both parties are on board.  I don't believe
> that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being
> installable if people want.

In that context he's saying that "the package existing and being
installable" is not something that the Desktop team has a say over.  So
saying that they wouldn't block that from happening is not a compromise.
 It's how things would have been without a compromise.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090424/48d33811/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list