On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:45 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > A compromise that does absolutely nothing, that is 0%, to address my > > concerns is productive how? > > > > Have the concerns of the person that sparked this whole thing become > > irrelevant at some point along the way? > > > > This thing has certainly spun far out of my control, and no longer even > > has much to do with what I wanted in the first place. > > Unfortunately it wasn't just your needs we were trying to address in the > meeting. Just sayin'. I'm sure not getting anything out of this so far. Who's needs are we trying to address now? Do they have a name? It feels like FESCo is trying to address the needs of two straw men at this point.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part