[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10
- From: Michael Cronenworth <mike cchtml com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:46:39 -0500
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10
From: Dennis J. <dennisml conversis de>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Date: 04/27/2009 02:48 PM
That's really my point. 2.6.30 will be out soon so 2.6.29 will be
outdated again. What is the motivation of putting this much work into a
kernel that will be outdated when released and only have a shelf-life of
7 or 8 months. Is there some critical feature in there that makes 2.6.29
so much better than 2.6.27 to warrant this much effort for so little gain?
2.6.29 works great on F10 for me and many others. Waiting for 2.6.30 is
not required and will waste *more* time.
I need 2.6.29 on my laptop so that suspend works. That's kind of important.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]