Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10

["Nathanael D. Noblet" <nathanael gnat ca>]

Dennis J. wrote:
> That's really my point. 2.6.30 will be out soon so 2.6.29 will be 
> outdated again. What is the motivation of putting this much work into a 
> kernel that will be outdated when released and only have a shelf-life of 
> 7 or 8 months. Is there some critical feature in there that makes 2.6.29 
> so much better than 2.6.27 to warrant this much effort for so little gain?

Not being involved in the work involved for 2.6.29, but totally enjoying 
it. It fixes a number of issues I've had on my system with various 
hardware (USB, graphics...)

--
Nathanael d. Noblet
T: 403.875.4613