KDE vs. GNOME on F10
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Aug 5 19:49:35 UTC 2009
On 08/05/2009 03:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The missing bit of the argument from before is whether we actually want
> to care about people who only want 'stable' updates, and that tracks
> back to the question of what Fedora actually is, which I don't believe
> the Board has settled yet. If we don't care about providing a stable
> update set, then implementing this system would be unnecessary work, and
> it's fine to continue simply to have a single repo and allow adventurous
> updates to be sent there.
See, this is different. If you're waiting for the board to define "what
Fedora actually is", you're going to die waiting. I'm of the opinion
that such a question is too broad and vague.
Now, if you wanted to know how the board feels about providing "a stable
updates set", and you can elaborate on what that means and how it works,
with less handwaving and miracles, I think we could give a more
productive and useful answer. *
~spot, Fedora Board member, speaking for himself only
* Although, strictly speaking, that sort of thing is in FESCo's domain.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list