[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: KDE vs. GNOME on F10



On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It also would require multiple CVS branches, one for security, one for
> adventurous, as well as different buildroots to go along with those,
> since you wouldn't be able to build a security update for a gnome
> package against the newer adventurous gtk and expect it to work on the
> older GTK, likewise if you had to modify a gnome package to work with
> newer gtk, you dont' want those modifications in the way if/when you
> need to do a conservative security update for it later.

Oh I forgot, you also need -testing versions of each of those repos, so
for any release, you could have updates, updates-testing, experimental,
and experimental-testing repo options and build targets and buildroot
shuffling going on.  WHAT FUN!

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project          (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
identi.ca               (http://identi.ca/jkeating)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]