[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: KDE vs. GNOME on F10



On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> > Either way it's going to be some level of extra work for someone
> > somewhere, I haven't denied that. Was just discussing the parameters of
> > addressing (or not addressing) this issue. It's not possible to make all
> > parties happy in the current framework, so either we change something,
> > or we take a specific decision to make some parties unhappy, and justify
> > that formally.
> > 
> Sure.  I'm just pointing out that you're trying to solve a different
> problem than either the original poster or Thorsten.  (And now that I
> understand your problem better, perhaps yours is already solved :-)

Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of
expectation: we have two similar components, GNOME and KDE, in the same
distribution, following different update polices - GNOME favours stable,
KDE favours adventurous. This confounds expectation.

Yes, my problem is potentially almost solved with the tools at our
disposal and some little tweaks to interfaces, except for the problem
raised by Jesse, see my reply to his post. :)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]