[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: KDE vs. GNOME on F10
- From: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: KDE vs. GNOME on F10
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:06:08 -0700
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:35 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I definitely see what you're saying, and yeah, perhaps an issue is
> > that
> > we don't have enough of a separate identity for the separate spins. We
> > don't have Kedora and Gedora (or Dedora, if you like ;>), we have
> > Fedora...but still, there's enough updates pushed even in packages in
> > the Desktop spin which wouldn't go through in a more conventionally
> > defined update process (ask yourself if RHEL would ship 'em :>).
>
> That's not a useful argument. There is a huge difference between what
> RHEL would ship, and a conservative bugfix update. RHEL typically
> requires a paying customer contacting support about an issue, escalation
> from there, 3 levels of ACK/NACK decisions, and finally gobs of QA on a
> package before it ever goes out. Vastly different than what we do in
> Fedora, even for conservative updates.
OK, bad example, but you know what I mean.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]