KDE vs. GNOME on F10

Jaroslav Reznik jreznik at redhat.com
Fri Aug 7 08:05:20 UTC 2009


On Friday 07 August 2009 04:21:56 Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean.
> >
> > Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that is
> > released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year, with
> > conservative updates to the platform.  That's nearly exactly what we
> > have in Fedora Desktop.  There is also room for a Fedora offering that
> > is released frequently (every 6 months), supported for about a year,
> > with aggressive updates to the latest and greatest for the platform.
> > That's nearly exactly what we have in Fedora KDE.
> >
> > The real problem is going to be when somebody wants to make an offering
> > that features GNOME but has aggressive updates to latest and greatest
> > GNOME on every update stream, as that cannot coexist with the
> > conservative Fedora Desktop.
>
> The other problem is if you'd like stable updates but you prefer KDE, or
> vice versa =)

Why do you expect that updating to the latest KDE means unstable system? ;-) 

> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
> http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik at redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list