[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: soname number bump for audit-libs



On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> 
> Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in
> under a week is simply not reasonable.  Sorry, it just isn't.  If
> reviews are going to be blocked on package reviews, get those reviews in
> early, not at the last minute.
> 
> If something important, like a new feature or something disruptive like
> this is going to be held up by a package review but needs to get done by
> feature or alpha freeze time, please make an announcement to that
> effect, or at least indicate that in the review itself.  The review in
> question (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602) said
> nothing about this issue.  Otherwise the reviewers have no idea that
> they should prioritize this review.

Or line up a peer to do your review instead of just waiting for a
volunteer to pick up the review.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]