[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Epiphany effectively orphaned



On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:37 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> > sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no
> > longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to
> > an appropriate person / group.
> 
> Wouldn't that be to the current maintainer to say so?

sure, if the 'gecko-maint' group is happy to maintain a non-gecko
component, that's fine (though may look a bit confusing). I just wanted
to flag the issue up, as Epiphany is a quite important package (it's
GNOME's official browser, even if we ship Firefox on our 'desktop'
spin).

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]