[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Updates lacking descriptions



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Correct, such a step will add a significant bureaucratic burdons to
> maintainers.
> 
> As maintainers hate bureaucrazy and prefer investing time on dealing
> with technical issues (such as bug fixes), this will likely introduce a
> further reduction of the quality of Fedora.
> 
> Further more, do you realise that any changelog is likely similarly
> unreadable to most users?

Nonsense, it's not bureaucracy to expect an update to actually say what 
changed and why you're pushing it. I, for one, always read the descriptions.

> PS.: Stop cross-posting to newsgroups. I consider everybody who does
> this to behave rude.

We're not cross-posting, we're replying to gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel 
only (using our NNTP clients). What Gmane does with it is out of our 
control. Any complaints about inadequacy of the Gmane gateway will have to 
go to Gmane.

        Kevin Kofler



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]