[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Updates lacking descriptions





On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:53:57 +0200, Kevin wrote:

Ralf Corsepius wrote:

With you folks demanding more explicit changelogs you are rudestly
pushing around package maintainers and force them to waste time to
fullfill your solely burecratic demands.

You're free to leave.

Won't speak for Ralf, but I consider such a comment as insolent.
It's not how fellow Fedora contributors should communicate with
eachother. Certainly not in public messages.

Why the double standard? If you consider what Michael wrote to be
'insolent', Ralf's mail was certainly far far beyond that, with its
opening suggestion that Michael is a dribbling moron - "as ususal, you
are demonstrating your lack of competence and understanding" - its
follow-up suggestion that he's a paper-pushing nincompoop - "you are
rudestly pushing around package maintainers and force them to waste time
to fullfill your solely burecratic demands" - and final salvo indicating
that he's 'hostile and rude' for using a newsgroup gateway - "You simply
are violating the netiquette ... i.e. you are hostile and rude to this
lists users". I'd say that was a fairly mild response.


This thread is over. Additional, helpful comments can either start a new thread or go offlist.


-sv



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]