Re: Confusion with openal-soft

[Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>]

On 08/17/2009 03:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:24:38 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> 
>> On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
>>> branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
>>> everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft.
>>
>> The rebuild is *unnecessary*. The obsolete was added *incorrectly* for
>> the stable branches and has been fixed now. Read the bug report I
>> referenced in the original mail before replying.
> 
> You two are talking past eachother IMO. As I understand it,
> Christoph refers to anyone who wishes to (re)build with the new
> openal-soft packages, regardless of whether it must be done or not.

I know the process to do it if it was necessary to do so. It is simply
not applicable in the current situation since the obsolete was added
incorrectly.

Rahul