Confusion with openal-soft
Christoph Wickert
christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Mon Aug 17 15:02:23 UTC 2009
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 16:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 08/17/2009 03:54 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 15:24 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >> On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
> >>> branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
> >>> everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft.
> >>
> >> The rebuild is *unnecessary*.
> >
> > It's on the maintainers (but not on you) to decide whether the rebuild
> > is unnecessary or not.
>
> The maintainer of openal-soft has already admitted that the obsolete was
> incorrect and fixed it in Fedora and Fedora 10 and informed me about it
> offlist.
Thomas is a first timer, who joined Fedora recently. Please don't judge
him by your standards and please don't expect him to follow procedures
that are not even outlined in the wiki.
> I am a maintainer of a package (tremulous) affected by the
> obsolete and I am not supposed to say that it is unnecessary to rebuild?
You can only speak for yourself and your package, but not for other
maintainers or packages.
> That doesn't make any sense to me. What exactly are you fighting about
> now? The problem is already solved.
The problem is solved, but your incorrect statement about maintainers
not being able to fix their packages was still not corrected on the
list. I just wanted to correct that. I'm not fighting, I'm protecting a
fellow friend of mine against unjustified accusations.
> Rahul
Regards,
Christoph
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list