[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20090826 changes
- From: Quentin Armitage <Quentin Armitage org uk>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20090826 changes
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:48:07 +0100
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Brian Pepple<bpepple fedoraproject org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:58 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Broken deps for i386
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>> > anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>> > anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol)
>> > anjal-0.1.0-0.7.20090821git5ac8bfe.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>> > empathy-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>> > empathy-devel-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol)
>> > empathy-libs-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>> > empathy-python-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>> > nautilus-sendto-1.1.6-2.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
>>
>> I don't remember the bump nitrification email for this going to fedora-devel.
>
> My fault. I wasn't aware of anything using mission-control other than
> empathy & nautilus-sendto which I was working on updating. Sorry.
Thee seems to be a dependency peculiarity with
telepathy-mission-control-5.2.1-1; it requires libmcclient-5.2.1.so,
which is provided by telepathy-mission-control-devel; should a package
have a dependency on its -devel package? Further,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1513479 shows that
telepathy-mission-control-devel both provides and requires
libmcclient-5.2.1.so; is this normal?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]