[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ABRT for f12 status



On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:26 AM, drago01<drago01 gmail com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walters<walters verbum org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01<drago01 gmail com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walters<walters verbum org> wrote:
>>>> Hi internets,
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11).  The
>>>> core capturing seems to work well.  In brief, I propose to apply the
>>>> (attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in.
>>>>
>>>> For upgrades, we'll need to add a Conflicts: bug-buddy, correct?
>>>
>>> No, you want Obsoletes: bug-buddy, so yum/anaconda will replace
>>> bug-buddy with abrt.
>>
>> Ok, thanks.  Should then the current
>>
>> %package addon-kerneloops
>> [...]
>> Conflicts: kerneloops
>>
>> Also be changed to Obsoletes?
>
> Yes a conflict will just prevent it from getting installed when
> kerneloops is installed. (which is kinda useless and not what was
> intended here)
> Obsoleting a specific version would be even better:
> Obsoletes: kerneloops <= lastestversion

But do we even want to drop kerneloops from the distro?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]