[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Electric Fence - still reliable?
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Electric Fence - still reliable?
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:18:30 +0000
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:55 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:07:04 +0100, I wrote:
>
> > Fedora 12 with LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1, what is
> > more likely that these are false positives or real bugs?
>
> It's hard to find GNOME/GTK apps that don't crash. One that works fine
> in efence is "gnome-about".
>
> Many non-GUI tools also pass. procps's w doesn't, and that's not a false
> positive:
>
> $ w
>
> Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce perens com>
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> ==> setlocale() usage bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/548711
>
>
> $ eog
>
> Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens <bruce perens com>
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> ==> in ORBit corba-any.c once more
All the GNOME apps that use GConf or ORBit will fail because you need to
set the alignment to 8. Same problem under valgrind.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]