Re: ABRT considered painful

[Huzaifa Sidhpurwala <huzaifas redhat com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Schwendt wrote:
> What's wrong with ABRT?
> 
> Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
> bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older.
> 
> And later? - Recently, in all the backtraces dozens of debuginfo packages
> are missing. :-(
> 
I agree,
Most of the abrt crash bugzilla i am assigned too, have missing
debuginfo packages, kind of use less for debuging.
I can ask the user to install debuginfo packages and get back to me.
But without that i will have to close those bzs

- --
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas)


GnuPG Fingerprint:
3A0F DAFB 9279 02ED 273B FFE9 CC70 DCF2 DA5B DAE5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFLOsdWzHDc8tpb2uURAgCXAJ9wtE+AsAwTwRs/zh/l3wWjJqOtkgCbB5RR
feqGm/5gDfJn4OOdhpeWEy0=
=f/Mh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----