Re: RFC: Disabling blinking cursor by default

[Matthew Garrett <mjg redhat com>]

On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:34:45PM -0500, Dimi Paun wrote:

> Besides, we seem to enjoy pain: nobody will appreciate a  non-blinking
> cursor, yet we know _some_ will have a big problem with it. The only
> people benefiting from it is the ones doing mental calculations about
> trees saved. That's a tiny minority.

I've spoken to several customers who find even single watt savings 
interesting. Claiming that they're in the minority is an unerified 
statistic - claiming that this change saves power is not.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 srcf ucam org