Why do we disable esd in libgnome?

平天韩 hanpingtian at gmail.com
Wed Feb 4 02:02:31 UTC 2009


2009/2/4 Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com>

> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Linus Walleij <triad at df.lth.se> wrote:
> >> I'm talking
> >> about making an API that exists in the platform continue to work until
> >> it can be removed.
> >
> > It can be removed now. Convert apps over to libcanberra.
>
> You can't remove it. That would break the API, something that GNOME will
> not do.
>
> Again...
>
> Porting apps to libcanberra is the right thing to do. Convert every
> single one you find. But, gnome_sound_play is in the platform until
> GNOME-3.0 comes along and API can be broken. In that case, why not
> have gnome_sound_play actually do something useful since it's dead
> simple to do it?
>

Agree. I think we shouldn't force apps to use new API by disable  old API
which works fine.

>
> --
> Dan
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090204/d0662835/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list