On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:10 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:07:37PM +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > > > Something along these lines would be awesome. It would work for > > whenever you're working, and would disappear when you're not actively > > using the computer. Yes, that's simplistic, but it covers a lot of > > complaints. The specific number, I don't know. > > The reason I'm not keen on this idea is that it means the cursor blinks > when you already know where it is and doesn't blink when you don't, > which would appear to defeat the purpose. > That's a good point. I didn't think of that. So, I change my vote (like it matters) to no more blinking, period. ________________________________________________________________________ Basil Mohamed Gohar abu_hurayrah hidayahonline org www.basilgohar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part