[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]

From: Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>
To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:13:57 +0100

Callum Lerwick wrote:
> We're going to need this eventually. As flash drives get bigger, FAT
> becomes more and more undesirable.

That's what ext2/ext3/ext4 is for.

        Kevin Kofler

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays
  - From: Till Maas

References:
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]