Conrad Meyer wrote:
Theoretically, yes. Unfortunately, there seem to be some packagers who seem to be unwilling to accept *-static.On Tuesday 17 February 2009 10:52:50 pm Jesse Keating wrote:On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 23:23 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:I don't have a good way to search for static linking without examining bins, but I've got a cold and feel like utter poo, so maybe I'm missing something!I think when the static guidelines were put in place, it was so that we could easily discover the static packages, this being one of the reasons.Could it be as simple as anything BuildRequiring *-static?
Ralf